A sports writer based in Hoquiam, Wash. is stuck without an outlet to release his spleen on anything and everything. Life is full of upper-class twits and they need to be dealt with... Lemon Curry?
Or is it just me?
Published on November 1, 2003 By rvrfhsiahskfhghia In Music
Sitting at home, I turned on MTV2 and watched a half hour of Metallica’s Greatest Hits.
From what I saw, most of it was from Load, Reload, S&M (with the San Francisco Orchestra) and from St. Anger, their newest album.
It wasn’t bad. It has been a while since I’ve put a Metallica CD in my player, but I also felt funny. Is it me or has Metallica (to borrow a Seinfeld term) jumped the shark?

When I was in middle school and in the beginning of high school in the mid-1980s, Metallica was the consummate metal band — the ones whose videos you won’t see on MTV and songs you won't hear on the radio.
I was introduced to Metallica from my uncle, who was just a few years older than me. Ride The Lightening, Master of Puppets, Kill ’em all, the Garage EP — I learned of Metallica.
When I heard of Cliff Burton’s death, I was saddened. When Jason Newstead joined, first with Garage Days Re-revisited, then ... And Justice For All, I was stoked.
Their posters joined my Iron Maiden, AC/DC and Run-DMC-ladened walls in my bedroom. (Yeah, strange grouping, but that was me...)
I saw Metallica play in Petaluma just before the Black Album came out, hearing about the impromptu practice show on the radio that morning and driving quickly to Petaluma from my junior college with friends in tow. That was cool.
I picked up Cliff ’em all, the video tape that chronicled Cliff Burton’s time in Metallica, for my younger brother for Christmas. He loved it. In fact, he told me later (and thanked me) that that video convinced him to be in a band and to get into music. He’s now a music teacher in Stockton, Calif. and he played bass for Kalifornia Redemption for a while and other bands before then.
Like those bands above, less so Iron Maiden now, they’re good friends that you listen to when life is good, bad, horrible, great, indifferent. I remember where I was at certain times in my life when a particular song is on. It’s cool.
I have every Metallica CD now, including Reload, which I like, but not as much as Load or S&M. But for a long while, I haven’t listened to them. I hear their songs on the radio now (99.9 Rock in Seattle) and occasionally I see a video or two.
Hell, I remember what a big deal it was when Metallica’s “One” debuted. The song was based on the movie, “Johnny Got Your Gun,” and scenes from the movie are in the video. Excellent. The movie itself, with Jason Robarts, isn’t bad. I believe it is an anti-Vietnam piece.
Now, a Metallica video isn’t a big deal anymore, although they are well-done.

Like I said, it has been a while since I’ve listened to them. I saw them on television railing downloaders about bootleg versions of their songs and albums off the Internet and suing anyone who comes close to playing one of their songs without them knowing it.
But now, they kicked Jason out of the band because he wanted to do his own side projects, which Lars and James wouldn’t let him do. They have a new bassist, but who knows what his name is. They’re also going to be playing Las Vegas on New Years Eve. (You know, that just sounds weird. Metallica... Las Vegas... New Years Eve...)
I’ve heard the singles to St. Anger now and... well, I just might not be buying this album. It sounds like they’re trying to be modern speed metal, which is just a bad copy of their first three albums. But that’s just my opinion...
But then again, I may just be one of those fans who remembers what it was like to hear Metallica for the first time and to think that it was the best thing you’ve ever heard.
Ah man, at 31, I’m becoming a fuddy-duddy... “I remember when Metallica wasn’t played on the radio and you’d never see their videos on MTV...”
Damn, I better shut up now or I’ll really start to sound old...
Comments
on Nov 01, 2003
Good topic!

I haven't really felt like listening to Metallica since after "...and Justice for All." The "One" video was awfully cool, and then everything after that wasn't exactly interesting.

What has surprised me most is my recent indifference to Ozzy's latest album. I have everything that he has done, except I haven't felt inspired to get his latest one. I was listening to "Ozzmosis" the other day, and I was impressed with how much I liked that album. (I do however still prefer the Black Sabbath stuff.)

I guess that all of this is part of being 31, isn't it?

RATT is coming here (to Minnesota) next week. I still don't have tickets, and they used to be my FAVORITE.

Have a happy day.
on Nov 01, 2003
The new bass player is rob trujillo

St anger is not worth the money, although the included DVD is pretty cool.
on Nov 02, 2003
I am a great fan of Metallica but I have to admit that their latest album just sucks...
Its substantialy different from previous ones. The change is in wrong direction...
on Nov 02, 2003
Hey, I figure it all changes, maybe Metallica doesn't suck so much as my musical tastes have changed ehh? (but I'm probably wrong) Getting old sucks , and I'm not directing that to you ... late
on Nov 03, 2003
That's just it. They hit mainstream popularity, they changed their sound to be just like all the other pseudo-metal bands out there.

But who really knows why? Maybe they -really- wanted to change like this? Pressure from the record labels? Maybe they just got tired of years (and years,) of being big, but seeing less talented, cookie-cutter 'metal' bands passing them by? Maybe they just wanted the cash.

Erm... Yes, I'm rambling! Woo. 2.30am posts. Need to avoid 'em.
on Nov 03, 2003
Eh, I really hated their last album... Black was their signing off for me. I do however, want to thank them for bringing this whole peer 2 peer sharing in to the public light. Where would be now without them?

In response to kthxbye. Yah mainstream is right.

The cutting of the hair, the changing of style, greed and probably old age more then trying something new has kept them from being the band they were and deffinately the band they could have been.
on Nov 03, 2003
I remember the first time I heard Metallica. I was on a bus with my hockey team headed to a tournament in Long Island. Our goalie slapped some headphones on me and said, here, listen to *THIS*.

It was "Fight Fire with Fire."

I was stunned. It seemed so heavy -- so *extreme* -- I couldn't believe it. These guys were just blowing the frickin doors off. It didn't even seem possible they were playing instruments. I had a vague idea drums were involved; maybe some guitars -- maybe. But this was not music as I understood it. This was a new, Clockwork Orange-like method for directly piping Rage and Angst into one's brain -- no instruments necessary. It was utterly incredible, and I was immediately hooked.

Listening to it again twenty years later I'm struck by how Angry Young Man it all is. I don't mean that as a put down. The fact that their music so perfectly distilled violence, rage, and despair -- without at the same time making them appear utterly ridiculous (like King Diamond, for instance) -- shows the extent to which they succeeded and blew away the competition. A hundred years from now when someone asks what the "heavy" in Heavy Metal means, they'll be played "For Whom the Bell Tolls."

Unfortunately, though the members of Metallica may still be Angry (at downloading teens), they are no longer Young. And when I hear a rich forty-something rasping bitter lyrics over triple-layered, thrashing guitars -- my bullshit-detector blows a circuit.

They were great -- maybe the greatest -- at what they did.

But it's time to call it day.
on Nov 03, 2003
It's funny, but I think a lot of us "31" year olds will agree with your view on Metallica. I *loved* Metallica. I had all their tapes when I was in high school. (Tapes...that sound weird...) I started losing "faith" when their "Black" album came out. I bought their last album. I listened to it enough to know that I'll let my 5 year old turn it into a Christmas tree ornament. It's just so sad because I used to love their music. It had an edge to it. Now it just sounds like slapped together basement crap. I liked them better with long hair
on Nov 03, 2003
"Unfortunately, though the members of Metallica may still be Angry (at downloading teens), they are no longer Young. And when I hear a rich forty-something rasping bitter lyrics over triple-layered, thrashing guitars -- my bullshit-detector blows a circuit."

To that, Owen - all I have to say is: http://www.imotorhead.com/index.html
Remember, Lemmy turned 50 in /1995/.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go put Master of Puppets in... Ha - no, that's a lie... it's "1916"
on Nov 03, 2003
Agreed. I agree with Rob, and I agree with Owen. It's time to call it a day. Let some of the supposedly "younger" bands make thier way onto the playing field.

Ah, but then Metallica would argue with me - pointing at guys like the Stones, and Chicago, and the remaining members of the Dead, who are all still out there.

I'll use Chicago as an example (as they're fav of mine) - they're still out touring every year. Almost year round. And the shows are good. But these guys are old. And they're not turning out new music as a group. Yes, there are some pretty hot side projects out there (Howland-Imboden Project, Robert Lamm's "Subtlety and Passion", Champlin's Sons of Champlin projects), but they're not putting anything new out. Mostly because record companies are looking for that next power ballad laden album... which is something they want to put behind them.

Now, maybe that's where Metallica needs to stop and think - stop putting out crap or stuff that they don't want out there and make music that they want to make. I shudder to think, however, that St. Anger's cuts are stuff that they actually *want* to make. I sincerely hope that that's not the case.

Maybe they need to put in a year or two doing the concert circuit and then quietly retire. Put it out to pasture and either work on solo stuff, or producing, or mentoring another band that's a rising star.

But don't put out music just for the sake of putting out music because you know you have a dedicated fan base that you know will buy it just because it's *you* (kind of like people buying every book from a certain author they love, even though the author is past thier prime and recycling plot lines).

When are musicians going to start caring about thier music again and stop caring as much about the bottom line? I understand that a person's gotta eat and pay the mortgage on the mansion, but come on... you have to know when to quit....
on Nov 03, 2003
Whiz,
You brought up a really good point.
In the beginning, Metallica said that they wouldn't be one of those bands who stuck around, making crappy music that no one likes. They'd die first. They swore that they'd never do that, even doing a parody of themselves as lounge singers inside Garage, Inc.
Well, someone likes St. Anger or they're doing a wonderful impression of living zombies.

RB 8)
on Nov 03, 2003
" stop putting out crap or stuff that they don't want out there and make music that they want to make."

The question is, of course, how do you know that the garbage they pump out now isn't the music they /want/ to make? I'd shudder to think that it is, because if it is, it's even scarier - but... it just might be.

And of course, Rob, Metallica may have said that in the beginning - but there's two things they didn't have as much of as they do now: Money and fame. Those two things can definitely change the way you view things!
on Dec 13, 2003
eh, I;ve never been a Metallica fan. That one song they play where the video is in a prison... that is just dreadful. IMO. My comment was mainly --- I didn't think "jump the shark" came from Seinfeld. Which episode was that? I had just read it had to do with HAPPY DAYS. I didn't know seinfeld started it.